Slow cracks may be simple, with no internal structure. The leading edge of a simple crack, the crack front, forms a single fracture plane in its wake. Slow cracks may also develop segmented crack fronts, each segment propagating along a separate fracture plane. These planes merge at locations that form steps along fracture surfaces. Steps are not stationary, but instead propagate within a crack front. Real-time measurements of crack front structure and energy flux reveal that step dynamics significantly increase energy dissipation and drastically alter crack dynamics. Simple and stepped cracks are each stable. By extending the use of energy balance to include 3D crack front structure, we find that, while energy balance is obeyed, it is insufficient to select the energetically favorable crack growth mode. Transitions from stepped cracks to simple cracks occur only when their in-plane front lengths become equal and a perturbation momentarily changes step topology. Such 3D crack dynamics challenge our traditional understanding of fracture.
A large earthquake unlocks a fault-zone via dynamic rupture while releasing part of the elastic energy stored during the interseismic stage. As earthquakes occur at depth, the analyses of earthquake physics rely primarily on experimental observations and conceptual models. A common view is that the earthquake instability is necessarily related to the frictional weakening that is commonly observed in shear experiments under seismic slip velocities. However, recent experiments with frictional interfaces in brittle acrylics (e.g., Svetlizky & Fineberg, 2014,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13202) and rocks (e.g., Passelegue et al., 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18937-0) have explicitly demonstrated that no characteristic frictional strength exists. Namely, prior to nucleation, frictional interfaces can sustain a wide range of applied stresses (“overstresses”) that exceed the residual stresses, which are the stresses along the interface that remain after the sliding. Moreover, the experimentally observed singular stress-fields and rupture dynamics are precisely those predicted by fracture mechanics (Freund, 1998). We therefore argue here that earthquake dynamics are best understood in terms of dynamic fracture mechanics and not governed by the frictional properties of faults. In this view, rupture dynamics are driven by the release of the elastic energy due to overstresses, whereas the values of the residual stresses and the energy dissipation are determined by fault frictional properties.
Songlin Shi, Wang, Meng , Poles, Yonatan , and Fineberg, Jay . 2023.
“How Frictional Slip Evolves”. Nature Communications, 14. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44086-1.
Earthquake-like ruptures break the contacts that form the frictional interface separating contacting bodies and mediate the onset of frictional motion (stick-slip). The slip (motion) of the interface immediately resulting from the rupture that initiates each stick-slip event is generally much smaller than the total slip logged over the duration of the event. Slip after the onset of friction is generally attributed to continuous motion globally attributed to ‘dynamic friction’. Here we show, by means of direct measurements of real contact area and slip at the frictional interface, that sequences of myriad hitherto invisible, secondary ruptures are triggered immediately in the wake of each initial rupture. Each secondary rupture generates incremental slip that, when not resolved, may appear as steady sliding of the interface. Each slip increment is linked, via fracture mechanics, to corresponding variations of contact area and local strain. Only by accounting for the contributions of these secondary ruptures can the accumulated interface slip be described. These results have important ramifications both to our fundamental understanding of frictional motion as well as to the essential role of aftershocks within natural faults in generating earthquake-mediated slip.
Frictional interfaces lose stability via earthquake-like ruptures, which are close analogues of shear cracks that are well-described by fracture mechanics. Interface ruptures, however, need to be first formed—or nucleated. Rupture nucleation therefore determines the onset of friction, replacing the concept of a characteristic “static friction coefficient”. Utilizing rupture arrest at an imposed barrier, we experimentally determine nucleation locations, times and stresses at the origin of each subsequent rupture event. This enables us study the nucleation process via real-time measurements of real contact area and local strain. Nucleation events initiate as 2D patches that expand at nearly constant velocities, vnuc, that are orders of magnitude lower than the dynamic rupture velocities described by conventional fracture mechanics. We find that: (a) Nucleation has location-dependent stress thresholds, (b) vnuc is roughly proportional to the local stress level, (c) the nucleation process continues until the patch size reaches Ltran ∼ LG, the Griffith length for the onset of dynamic fracture (d) scaling time by τ = Ltran/vnuc, nucleation patches exhibit self-similar dynamics (e) dynamic ruptures' cohesive zones are not fully established until significantly beyond Ltran. Many details of nucleation are governed by the local contact area topography, which is roughly invariant under successive rupture events in mature interfaces. Topography-dependent details of the nucleation process include: precise nucleation site location, patch geometry, critical stress thresholds and the proportionality constant of vnuc with stress. We believe that these results shed considerable light on both how frictional motion is triggered and earthquake initiation.
Brittle materials fail by means of rapid cracks. Classical fracture mechanics describes the motion of tensile cracks that dissipate released elastic energy within a point-like zone at their tips. Within this framework, a "classical"tensile crack cannot exceed the Rayleigh wave speed, cR. Using brittle neohookean materials, we experimentally demonstrate the existence of "supershear"tensile cracks that exceed shear wave speeds, cR. Supershear cracks smoothly accelerate beyond cR, to speeds that could approach dilatation wave speeds. Supershear dynamics are governed by different principles than those guiding "classical"cracks; this fracture mode is excited at critical (material dependent) applied strains. This nonclassical mode of tensile fracture represents a fundamental shift in our understanding of the fracture process.